Saturday, March 21, 2009
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Web 2.0 Vocabulary
In developing a presentation and a proposal centred around the idea of Web 2.0, I created a Wordle of terms associated-with / that-define Web 2.0:
Web 2.0 Wordle by Justin Longo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.
Based on a work at www.wordle.net. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.whitehallpolicy.ca.
Wordle is a toy for generating “word clouds” from text that the user provides. The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. Words and concepts were derived from a number of sources. To make some words and concepts more prominent in the Wordle than others, I simply used my judgment to force increased frequency on terms and concepts that I thought were more important than others.
I would really appreciate any feedback on this - especially with respect to two questions:
1. Any complaints about the frequency / prominance of some terms? For example, is "Silverlight" too prominent? (I think it is). BTW: "Tim Berners-Lee" is prominent partly out of respect and partly because of his critique of Web 2.0 being nothing new.
2. Any obvious missing terms (and the corollary, terms that really shouldn't be there)?
Here's the source text for this.
Web 2.0 Wordle by Justin Longo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.
Based on a work at www.wordle.net. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.whitehallpolicy.ca.
Wordle is a toy for generating “word clouds” from text that the user provides. The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. Words and concepts were derived from a number of sources. To make some words and concepts more prominent in the Wordle than others, I simply used my judgment to force increased frequency on terms and concepts that I thought were more important than others.
I would really appreciate any feedback on this - especially with respect to two questions:
1. Any complaints about the frequency / prominance of some terms? For example, is "Silverlight" too prominent? (I think it is). BTW: "Tim Berners-Lee" is prominent partly out of respect and partly because of his critique of Web 2.0 being nothing new.
2. Any obvious missing terms (and the corollary, terms that really shouldn't be there)?
Here's the source text for this.
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Life Imitates Art
Stephen Harper’s broadcast to the nation
bears an uncanny resemblance to the two following clips:
The Ministerial Broadcast 1
from about 1:50 to the end,
and
The Ministerial Broadcast 2
from the beginning to about 3:30
At least Harper studies something. Stephane Dion's response was beyond pathetic
bears an uncanny resemblance to the two following clips:
The Ministerial Broadcast 1
from about 1:50 to the end,
and
The Ministerial Broadcast 2
from the beginning to about 3:30
At least Harper studies something. Stephane Dion's response was beyond pathetic
Friday, September 26, 2008
Open Source Policy-Making
Andrea Di Maio, VP Distinguished Analyst at Gartner, asks a question that is central to my work at eBriefings.ca -
He also raises the point separately about government wikis and their use in policy analysis.
He also raises the point separately about government wikis and their use in policy analysis.
Why Briefing Notes Are Important
Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately become proof that they were busy.
Charles Peters. How Washington Really Works. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1983.
Charles Peters. How Washington Really Works. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1983.
The Other Peters Principle
"The Peters Principle-take care to distinguish it from the less persuasive Peter Principle -provides that organizations cease to function effectively when employees spend more than 15.8 percent of their time attending meetings or writing memoranda."
Tilting at windmills - meeting mania…review thine enemy…buppie taste…and other odds and ends
Washington Monthly, Feb, 1986, by Charles Peters.
How to Intellingently Ignore Unimportant Information
A four minute excerpt of a longer address by the great Perri 6.
Most information management systems being sold to governments are designed for providing access to more information, faster. However, a good information management / decision-support system better allows you to intelligently reject information not useful for making decisions. I'd slightly nuance that a bit - the trick is to keep all the information, but allow the decision maker to focus on the crucial bit.
Later observation (December 10 2008): at a conference in Ottawa, I asked one of the chief hucksters for these "more and more" information systems firms whether he thought Web 2.0 was failing to help us "intelligently ignore unimportant information" (IIUI) - his response, not surprisingly was that it allowed us to do precisely that. I'm not saying that Web 2.0 tools cannot or do not help us in IIUI, I'm just puzzled over whether they do, and how.
The full audio is available at: The Digital State at the Leading Edge Conference February 22, 2007 (Ottawa).
See also: Amazon.ca: E-Governance : Styles of Political Judgment in the Information Age
Most information management systems being sold to governments are designed for providing access to more information, faster. However, a good information management / decision-support system better allows you to intelligently reject information not useful for making decisions. I'd slightly nuance that a bit - the trick is to keep all the information, but allow the decision maker to focus on the crucial bit.
Later observation (December 10 2008): at a conference in Ottawa, I asked one of the chief hucksters for these "more and more" information systems firms whether he thought Web 2.0 was failing to help us "intelligently ignore unimportant information" (IIUI) - his response, not surprisingly was that it allowed us to do precisely that. I'm not saying that Web 2.0 tools cannot or do not help us in IIUI, I'm just puzzled over whether they do, and how.
The full audio is available at: The Digital State at the Leading Edge Conference February 22, 2007 (Ottawa).
See also: Amazon.ca: E-Governance : Styles of Political Judgment in the Information Age
Google Moderator
Check out Google Moderator, a simple tool for moderating group questions. Questions are nominated by users, and others vote on them. Lets you know what an audience wants to ask a speaker.
Labels:
audience,
Conference Moderator,
Google Moderator,
questions
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Congressional Budget Office: innovations in presenting uncertainty?
The CBO Director’s blog has an entry on “Long term projections for Social Security: innovations in presenting uncertainty” where he highlights the innovative use of what are essentially the “fan charts” used by the Bank of England over ten years ago (which at least incorporated shading to delineate the probability distribution):
CBO Charts

Bank of England Charts

Plus ca change ...
CBO Charts

Bank of England Charts

Plus ca change ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)